I realized today after re-reading what was published in In-Fisherman vs. the original article that was submitted to them, that there were actually only a few changes and one made up quote. My comments that the meat of the article were removed were not true, the majority of what was in there originally stayed in there. There were a few changed sections and the one quote about float tubes having a poor hole shot that was a made up quote, but my earlier post made it sound worse than it was, and for that I apologize. I went off half cocked on the deal because I happened to read the section that had the most changes first and that got me so irritated I didn't clearly read the rest.