RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
Tm Customs,
Mar 07th 2005, #1
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
Mike F,
Mar 07th 2005, #2
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
Lightninrod,
Mar 07th 2005, #3
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
Chris,
Mar 07th 2005, #4
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
magmaster,
Mar 08th 2005, #5
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
rockstar,
Mar 08th 2005, #6
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
Lightninrod,
Mar 09th 2005, #7
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
magmaster,
Mar 09th 2005, #8
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
rockstar,
Mar 09th 2005, #9
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
BillH,
Mar 23rd 2005, #10
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
nemorino,
Mar 23rd 2005, #11
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
rockstar,
Mar 24th 2005, #12
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
LFC,
Apr 15th 2005, #13
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
rockstar,
Apr 15th 2005, #14
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
bassnet,
Apr 17th 2005, #15
RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference...,
Rogue807c,
Apr 20th 2005, #16
| |
|
Lightninrod | Mon Mar-07-05 07:32 AM |
Member since Oct 31st 2003
533 posts
| |
|
#1962, "RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference..."
In response to Reply # 0
|
I can't comment on any "blind testing" but I do know this. Last weekend, I was throwing one of my 7' Kistler Heliums(Medium Casting) for about 2 or 3 hours. I picked up a a 7', Medium-fast, Fenwick Techna AV rod to throw a shallow cr/bait that was tied on. It was like "night and day" as far as my perception of the differences and the Techna is a decent, moderately priced rod, but it felt like a pool cue in my hand. No, I'm not exagerating to make a point. There was that much difference in the 'feel'(not just the weight difference) between those two rods. And no, I'm not a tourny guy. I have no sponcers and just fish as a weekender.
Dan "Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less"
Deo Vindice
|
|
|
|
|
Chris | Mon Mar-07-05 09:46 AM |
Charter member
2185 posts
| |
|
#1963, "RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference..."
In response to Reply # 0
|
The fish don't know if the angler is using a K-Mart special or a G-Loomis GLX. If a bait is presented correctly they'll eat it.
That said, a VW Bug will get you around the track at Daytona. It just won't do it at 250 miles per hour! (If that makes any sense to you)
Many of the inexpensive rods are made overseas. That's part of the reason they're so cheap. Obviously components are too. My main problem with these rods is how they are constructed. And some high end rods aren't immune. Short cuts are still taken to reduce production costs. I believe if you want to spend $300 on a rod, you should find a custom rod builder you trust and get it done right.
Chris
|
|
|
|
    |
rockstar | Tue Mar-08-05 08:28 PM |
Member since Aug 20th 2004
146 posts
| |
|
#1965, "RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference..."
In response to Reply # 5
|
Thank you for your replies. So far no one has truly answered my question. Would you make your purchases based on objective testing of your equipment: if ever some independant company did a "True Double Blind Test" on them? And what if after that testing it turned out your favorite high end rod faired no better than a middle of the road one? With all due respect the only information about any equipment one can get, wether it be on this board, or in a magazine, or on a manufacturers site, is anecdotal at best(with the exception of some of the specs they provide), and testamonial in most cases. What that boils down to is this- unreliable information. That is the nature of testimonials and anecdotal information and that is all that any of you have been able to offer. The reason I used the stereo industry as an example is because in my younger years I used to be into them, and it illustrates my point so nicely. I thought I could hear the difference between $150 amps and $5,000 custom jobs. Then a few enterprising fellows came up with a way to test a number of these jewels against a bunch of golden eared nerds like myself who were convinced they could hear the differences hands down. When the tests where done there were a lot of red faces. In actuality, there was no discernable differences.The same was true for the thousands of $ they spent on cables. One honest manufacturer out there now tells them to use the cheap Radio Shack stuff, if they want to spend more just send them a check for however much they think cable should cost. I'm not saying that will happen in this case with high end fishing rods. That would be foolish. I don't have a crystal ball. But until a true scientific test is set up and run it just cannot be said objectively that one rod is in fact more sensitive than any other rod. You can tell stories all day long about how your expensive rod(s) is in fact so much better than your previous cheaper rod but there is just no way to take your personal prejudice out of the equation. It doesn't mean your judgement is in any way wrong. With a double blind test it forces everyone to be 100% honest about every rod they test and we would get some very surprising results indeed. I can bet that's why it hasn't been done yet. I don't think the top end manufacturers want to really see how their rods would stack up against the other rods out there.
|
|
|
|
          | |
            |
nemorino | Wed Mar-23-05 11:01 AM |
Member since Nov 04th 2003
223 posts
| |
|
#1970, "RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference..."
In response to Reply # 10
|
I guess I can drop my 2 cents here.
I can imagine that the sensitivity and weight of a rod versus the price goes in a pretty exponential curve. The way stereo equipment may see a huge difference between a $50 amp and a $250 amp. However, the difference between a $5000 amp and a $6000 amp is not as great. Having said that, at what point is the curve in fishing rods insanely steep? $100, $200, $300?
For example, the weight and sensitivity of a $10 rod may be painfully subpar compared to a $100 rod. But will the same hold between a $100 rod vs. $200? or $200 vs. $300?
________________
Sonny
2004 - 6 Bass 2 Trout $219.20 in Gear
|
|
|
|
              | |
                |
LFC | Fri Apr-15-05 12:25 PM |
Member since Apr 15th 2005
1 posts
| |
|
#1972, "RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference..."
In response to Reply # 12
|
Hey everyone,
I've been checking out this site for a while and there is a lot of helpful info. This is my first post and I know it's kind of an old thread but I needed to respond to the "double blind" comment.
In any scientific experiment, depending on the type of data analysis you are going to use, you have to control every variable but the one or two that you are testing. In the case of the rods, this would be the experimental variable to be tested and this would be controlled.
You could do this by having different people fish different rods but at the same time and place.
In this example you have the variable of angler skill level between the different anglers. Not to mention that they cannot each be fishing in the exact same place for the exact same fish. Every fish reacts and hits bait a slight bit different. This example would not be a valid scientific study.
If you have one person fish the different rods, you still are not fishing for the same fish. It is impossible to control the "fish" variable. Also you have a sample of one which does not lend itself to acceptable data and it would not be a valid study.
I think most people would agree that you can tell the difference between a high end rod and a low or moderate end rod. Even if it is just the weight of it which makes for a much more comfortable fishing day.
With most things, you do get what you pay for up to a certain point, at that point I think it comes down to personal preference and ability. I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a $2000 set of golf clubs and a $300 set, but I know any professional golfer could. They would even tell you the differences between $2000 sets made by different companies. Same thing with fishing.
A few years ago I was fishing with a friend who was using a Loomis while I was using a $75 dollar rod. We were both dropshoting the same bait in the same general area. He was catching fish and I wasn't. It was a very light bite and they weren't swimming with it. He let me use his Loomis and I could feel the bite. I was sold. This was as close to "scientific" as it's going to get for me.
If the fish are hitting hard then any rod will transmit the "tick" but to be able to tell the difference between bottom content, different types of vegetation etc... as well as the fatigue factor I personally will stick to the high end rods.
If you don't feel comfortable paying the money for a product that isn't "scientifically" tested, then that's your choice, but I don't think you will ever see a "double blind" experiment of fishing rods with valid experimental methods. You would be testing "feel" which can not be properly compared between different people.
Sorry for the long first post...just my $.02
|
|
|
|
                  |
rockstar | Fri Apr-15-05 09:20 PM |
Member since Aug 20th 2004
146 posts
| |
|
#1973, "RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference..."
In response to Reply # 13
|
I had forgotten about this subject. I'd put it to rest- and you woke the beast from it's peaceful slumber. Cudos for the best response so far. Yes, it occured to me that there are indeed many other variables involved here and as such that hurdle can be jumped as well. One need only set up a pond/pool with a known environment and population of fish(fish can even be optional too- machines that can simulate fish nibbling/biting could be utilized). Employ trained statisticians as well as various other science/engineering graduate students under the supervision of a well seasoned researcher(s) and I do think that a test could indeed be designed that could do a very decent job of evaluating rod sensitivity, etc. with respect to the fisherman. Insofar as I do not think that all/most high end rods are less sensitive than the majority of mid-priced rods, in the spirit of a true skeptic (which I think many people don't get or even give a rip about) is that such claims must be proven to me if I am to fork out that much hard earned money. I love to fish. I hate to waist money. I like to find equipment that is the best bang for the buck. Sure I might get a bit more sensitivity with a $300-$600 rod, but will the improvement be that much more? Never in the history of the world has technology(due to good science) and free enterprise been able to offer me a 4.5oz, forty-eight million modulus rod with titanium guides, and Fuji seating, a Shimano Curado baitcaster, state of the art (fill in your favorite brand) line, and a tackle box filled with goodies, all for a half days' wages. My grandfather couldn't even acquire the line I have on my reel as it wasn't even available to the wealthiest man on Earth back in his day. So if I'm going to be told that rod X at $300 is superior to rod Y at $100, I say "Prove it." I can spend that other $200 on bait, hooks, gasoline, lunch, etc. and still not catch just as many fish. :) BTW Welcome to the board.
|
|
|
|
                    |
bassnet | Sun Apr-17-05 07:53 PM |
Charter member
1213 posts
| |
|
#1974, "RE: Honestly, I can't really tell the difference..."
In response to Reply # 14
|
It's all about time on the water and what works best for you, as well as what you can afford. The tennis example was very good- Obviously if I went fishing with a pro and used top end stuff and he used lesser quality stuff, I would still be outfished by a mile. I know what I like to fish with, having tried lots of tackle, and I can make an arguement for high end tackle making a difference for me in most applications. I have a couple of old (12 yrs. +/-)Team Daiwa rods that retailed for less then $100 that I bought in the early 90's that I always have mixed in with some Loomis GLX, and I guard those old Daiwas hard because they can't be replaced- not as high quality as a few other rods I own, but they feel right and work great for certain applications. I doubt the Pepsi Challenge for rods will ever happen, you have to see what works best for you. I think the thing I like best about those old Daiwas is the contoured hypalon handle, it just feels right, even though the graphite isn't the super premium it's definetly good enough to get the job done (mostly reaction baits).
|
|
|
|
|
|
© Copyright Robert Belloni 1997-2012. All Rights Reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without express written consent.
|